4. Questionnaire on Implementation of Recurrence

The Recurrence Technical Committee of the Consortium is collecting specific information on how calendaring and scheduling implementations have implemented or not implemented the recurrence rules of iCalendar as part of its work to compile actual usage information and develop recommendations to CalSIFY and other efforts.

This questionnaire is NOT limited to Consortium members; we need information from as many different implementations as possible. We appreciate your responding to this questionnaire with as much information about your implementation as you can. If you do not know whether the response to an individual rule instance is “Yes” or “No” please leave the response blank. We welcome as much information as you are able and willing to supply. If we have questions or are unclear about your responses we will contact you via the e-mail address you supply.

Our goal is to obtain a broad perspective on how recurrence has been dealt with in existing implementations. The final report which the Consortium will make public will not identify any particular product or implementation, nor will it present the results in a way which will allow such inferences to be made.